Cholera: Six suspected cases tested negative for Vibrio Cholreae tested negative for cholera
Ebola Virus Disease: Zero cases were reported
Immediately notifiable
Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP): No cases were reported in the week under review. Measles: A total of nine cases were reported this week from Lusaka (2), Northern (4), North Western (2) and Luapula (1) provinces. Three specimens were investigated for measles. Maternal Deaths: Countrywide nine maternal deaths were registered from Lusaka (3), Eastern (2), Southern (1), North Western (1), Copperbelt (1) and Luapula (1) provinces.
Dengue: One case was confirmed from Lusaka province from a person who recently travelled West Africa
Other diseases
Dysentery: Nationwide 841 of cases of dysentery were recorded this week. Of the twelve samples tested 1 was positive for S. dysenteriae
Regional Public Health Events
Source: WHO Weekly Bulletin on Outbreaks & Other Emergencies, Health & Emergencies Program
NATIONAL IDSR HEALTH FACILITY REPORTING RATES, WEEK 29 2019
OUTBREAKS
Cholera Outbreak
No cases of cholera were reported this week.
Cumulatively, 435 suspected cases of cholera were recorded from Lusaka and Northern provinces (Nsama, and Mpulungu districts) since week 1.
VACCINE PREVENTABLE DISEASES AFP Surveillance
No AFP cases were reported this week
Only 44% of the 92 reported case have had complete OPV vaccinations ( ≥ 3 or more doses)
Stool from the 83 adequate specimens were discarded for polioviruses, 7 are pending results
AFP Surveillance
The scheduled collections from the four sites in Lusaka district were conducted.
The sensitivity of environmental surveillance poliovirus detection remains adequate with ≥50% isolation of Non-Polio Enteroviruses; while the isolation rate among AFP cases is 7.6% (7/92).
No wild type polioviruses or circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses have been isolated from week 1 to 30.
Measles and Rubella
Countrywide nine cases were reported from Lusaka (2), Northern (4), North Western (2) and Luapula (1) provinces, 3 specimens were laboratory investigated for measles & rubella IgM.
26% (target 80%) of the reported IDSR have been cases laboratory tested
Positivity among the 154 tested cases for measles IgM is 22% (target 10%) and 1.3% for rubella
Only 20% of the tested have a history of vaccination
HIGH BURDEN DISEASES
HIV
33,301 cases were tested in the week under review, with a positivity rate of 6.0.
Lusaka and Central provinces have cumulatively reported high numbers of new cases from week 1.
TB
6.3% of the 3080 tested cases were confirmed positive for TB.
Cumulatively, Muchinga province has recorded the highest confirmed incidence of TB from weeks
Maternal Deaths
Countrywide nine maternal deaths were registered from Lusaka (3), Eastern (2), Southern (1), North Western (1), Copperbelt (1) and Luapula (1) provinces.
Obstetric hemorrhages continue to be the leading cause of death.
Dog Bites
299 cases of dog bites were recorded nation- wide.
Cumulatively, Central province has recorded the highest number of cases (1560) since week1.
18 fatal rabies deaths have bee recorded to date.
Malaria
114,355 suspected malaria cases were notified in the week; with a positivity rate of 30 % of the 114, 080 tested.
Central and Lusaka provinces recorded the highest cumulative incidence of malaria cases from week 1 to 30.112,001 suspected malaria cases were notified compared to 116,862 within week 28.
The confirmed incidence this week is 2.2/1000; the positivity rate for the confirmed cases this week was 51%.
North-western, Eastern and Luapula provinces recorded the highest cumulative incidence of malaria cases
EARLY WARNING DISEASES Ebola Virus, DRC and Uganda , 2018-2019
The EVD outbreak was declared a Public Health Emergency of Inter- national Concern
81 new confirmed cases and 45 new deaths were reported in the current week.
Cumulative cases stand at of 2659 which 2565 are confirmed and 1,688 deaths occurred (CFR is 66%).
Active transmission is ongoing with 13 of the 23 health reporting zones confirming cases in the last 7 days; .
The regional risk of spread re- mains high
PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIONS
General Recommendations
All provinces and districts affected by the outbreaks should conduct laboratory tests on suspect- ed cases to confirm the outbreak. Samples from suspected outbreaks must be tested in the appropriate district or provincial laboratory and at a national reference laboratory.
Ebola Virus Disease Preparedness
All provinces to strengthen EVD surveillance among all health care providers and raise community awareness of EVD prevention
Provide weekly reports in IDSR reports of active searches including zero reposting in at-risk districts, including ports of entry
Ensure epidemic preparedness measures for detecting cases, sample testing/transportation and managing cases are effected
All border districts to strengthen point of entry EVD screening
Vaccine-Preventable Disease Surveillance in Silent Districts
Provinces to ensure silent districts not reporting AFP cases are supported for active surveillance
Provincial health offices to ensure sub regional attainment of the Non-Polio AFP rate of 2 cases per 100,000
Prioritize sample referral of suspected cases to the national reference laboratory
All suspected measles /AFP cases to be given a provisional clinical diagnosis before blood / stool samples are sent to the national reference laboratory for tests.
Active Surveillance in Cholera Hotspots
Known cholera prone regions to access risks and ensure epidemic preparedness and response measures in place for cholera prevention and control. Regions that have reported Cholera outbreaks should conduct public education on preventative measures and work all relevant stakeholders to prevent cholera outbreaks
Reported by: Surveillance and Disease Intelligence Unit
Writers: Chanda Groeneveld, Muzala Kapin’a, Moses Banda, Nkomba Kayeyi, Mazyanga M Liwewe, Victor Mukonka and Zambia National Public Health Institute (ZNPHI)
Cholera: Four suspected cholera cases from Mpulungu district tested negative for V. Cholerae Immediately notifiable
Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP): Five cases from Eastern and Southern provinces are undergoing laboratory investigation for polioviruses
Measles: A total of six cases were reported this week from Copperbelt (1), Lusaka (4) and Muchinga (1) province (1). Five specimens are being tested for measles and rubella
Maternal Deaths: Countrywide six maternal deaths were registered from Lusaka (2), Southern, Northern (2) and Central (1) provinces
Clustering of Illness: 817 respiratory tract infections were reported in Chipata district, no fatalities
Other diseases
Typhoid: Seven cases were reported this week from Lusaka (1) province. Dysentery: the suspected cases of dysentery increased from 557 to 722 in this week compared to the previous week. Only Nine samples tested positive for Shigella dysenteria in the week.
Weekly Summary
NATIONAL IDSR HEALTH FACILITY REPORTING RATES, WEEK 29 2019
OUTBREAKS
Cholera Outbreak, Mpulungu District, Northern Province
• No cases of cholera were reported this week; the last reported cases was on the 5th June 2019 • Cumulatively 439 suspected cases have been reported from Lusaka, Nsama, Mpullungu districts from week 1, positivity • The second round of the reactive Oral Cholera Vaccination (OCV) campaign converge is currently underway Mpulungu district.
Five cases from Eastern and Southern provinces are undergoing laboratory investigation for polioviruses
Only 44% of the laboratory tested cases have complete OPV vaccination ( ≥ 3 or more doses).
Stool from the 83 adequate specimens were discarded for polioviruses, 7 are pending results.
Environmental Polio Surveillance
The scheduled collections from the four sites in Ndola, Kitwe, Mufuiria and Chililabombwe
The sensitivity of environmental for poliovirus detection remains adequate with ≥50% isolation of Non-Polio Enteroviruses; while the isolation rate among AFP cases is 7..7% (7/90)
No wild type polioviruses or circulating vaccine-derived polioviruses have been isolated from week 1 to 25.
Measles and Rubella
A total of six cases were reported this week from Copperbelt (1), Lusaka (4) and Muchinga (1) province (1). Five specimens are being tested for measles and rubella.
Cumulatively 25.7% (152) of the 585 suspected cases have been laboratory investigated for measles IgM,19% have a history of vaccination.
HIGH BURDEN DISEASES
HIV
Nationwide week 35,056 cases were tested for HIV . The positivity rate among those tested cases was 5.11%
Lusaka and Central provinces have cumulatively reported high numbers of new cases from week 1.
TB
This week, 8.2 % of the 2877 suspected cases of TB were confirmed positive.
Cumulatively, Muchinga province has recorded the highest confirmed incidence of TB from weeks
Maternal Deaths
Countrywide six maternal deaths were registered from Lusaka (2), Southern, Northern (2) and Central (1) provinces
Obstetric hemorrhages continue to be the leading cause of death.
Lusaka, Western, and Eastern provinces have cumulatively recorded the highest number of deaths since week 1.
Dog Bites
283 cases of dog bites were recorded nation- wide.
Cumulatively, Central province has recorded
the highest number (1503) of cases dog bites from week 1 .
18 fatal rabies deaths have been recorded to date.
Malaria
112,001 suspected malaria cases were notified compared to 116,862 within week 28.
The confirmed incidence this week is 2.2/1000; the positivity rate for the confirmed cases this week was 51%.
North-western, Eastern and Luapula provinces recorded the highest cumulative incidence of malaria cases
EARLY WARNING DISEASES Ebola Virus, DRC and Uganda , 2018-2019
93 new confirmed cases and 72 new deaths were reported in the current week.
Cumulative cases stand at of 2578 which 2484 are confirmed and 1737 deaths occurred (CFR is 66%).
Active transmission is ongoing with 19 of the 23 health reporting zones confirming cases in the last 21 days; 138 health workers have been infected or 5% of the total confirmed and probable cases.
169 976 people have been vac- cinated since the beginning of the outbreak
Regional risk of spread remains high
PUBLIC HEALTH ACTIONS
General Recommendations
All provinces and districts affected by the outbreaks should conduct laboratory tests on suspect- ed cases to confirm the outbreak. Samples from suspected outbreaks must be tested in the appropriate district or provincial laboratory and at a national reference laboratory.
Regional level
Provide technical guidance for outbreak investigation and response to affected regions.
Support the distribution of epidemic preparedness consumables to affected areas.
Vaccine-Preventable Disease Surveillance in Silent Districts
Provincial health offices to ensure sub regional attainment of the Non-Polio AFP rate of 2 cases per 100,000
Prioritize sample referral of suspected cases to the national reference laboratory
All suspected measles /AFP cases to be given a provisional clinical diagnosis before blood/stool samples are sent to the national reference laboratory for tests.
Districts to promote health worker & community awareness of VPDs and usage of immunization services
All provinces should geocode reported AFP cases
Active Surveillance in Cholera Hotspots
Known cholera prone regions to access risks and ensure epidemic preparedness and response measures in place for cholera prevention and control. Regions that have reported Cholera outbreaks should conduct public education on preventative measures and work all relevant stakeholders to prevent cholera outbreaks
Methodology for Establishment of Epidemic Thresholds Thresholds are calculated using Moving Epidemic Methods (MEM), a sequential analysis using R language available from: http//CRAN.R-project.org/web/package =mem) designed to calculate the duration, start and end of the annual influenza epidemic. MEM uses the 40th, 90th and 97.5th percentile established from available years of historical data to calculate threshold activities. Threshold activity for influenza is categorized as: below epidemic threshold, low, moderate, high or very high. Transmissibility of influenza can be inferred from ILI data while SARI data gives an indication of severity.
Summary
There was increased influenza activity in the first half of 2019 between epi-weeks 4 and 22. Rates of Influenza-Like Illness (ILI) and Severe Acute Respiratory Infection (SARI) attributable to influenza virus infection remained within the low seasonal threshold. This first cycle of activity was of low transmissibility and low severity. Children below five years of age were most affected.
ILI Surveillance: Specimens from 553 outpatients were received from two ILI surveillance sites. 455 (82%) were adequately sampled and tested. Influenza virus was detected in 37 of these samples of which, 27 were identified as Influenza B, 3 Influenza A H3N2, 3 Influenza A H1N1 (pandemic) and 4 as Influenza A unsubtypeable.
SARI Surveillance: During this same period, specimens were received from 1055 patients admitted to four SARI surveillance sites. 651 (62%) were adequately sampled and tested. Influenza was detected in 29 specimens; 24 of which were identified as Influenza B, 1 as Influenza A H3N2, 1 as Influenza A H1N1 (pandemic) and 3 as Influenza A unsubtypeable.
Influenza Transmissibility Fig 1: Percentage of Influenza Positive ILI Cases1 (Out-Patient Visit Surveillance) per Epi-Week Against Epidemic Thresholds Set Using 2013 – 2018 Data
1ILI Case / Total ILI Sampled *100 In July 2019, SARI admissions attributable to influenza virus infection remained below epidemic threshold from week 27 to week 30. 29
30th June 2019: Influenza Severity (Impact) Fig 2: Hospital Admission Surveillance1 – (SARI Surveillance) for Influenza Detection and Epidemic Thresholds *
1 SARI Case / Total Admission Sampled *100 *Threshold based on 2013 – 2018 May – June 30th 2019, SARI admissions attributable to influenza virus infection from weeks 23 -26, fell below epidemic threshold for high severity.
Fig 3: Positives samples* by influenza types and detection rate by weeks in 2019.
*Specimens from patients with influenza-like illness at two (2) sentinel sites and three (3) sentinel sites for admitted patients from week 1 -25. The 2019 influenza season is currently characterized by a high spread of seasonal influenza and random detection of flu A, A H1N1 and subtypes A H3N2 in weeks, 1 – 17. A high number of seasonal influenza was detected between weeks 7-18 from all sentinel sites.A high number of seasonal and pandemic A influenza detections was in the age group between 1 – 4 years.
Fig: 5: Cumulative number of influenza types and subtypes and total number of samples tested by sentinel sites.
The total number of samples collected as at 31st July 2019, is 1584; 1334(84%) were tested. 89 (7%), were positive for influenza virus and 1245 (93%) were negative.
Dysentery is bloody diarrhoea, i.e. any diarrhoeal episode in which the loose or watery stools contain visible red blood. Dysentery is most often caused by Shigella species (bacillary dysentery) or Entamoeba histolytica (amoebic dysentery) [1]. Over the past years, Dysentery has not stimulated public fear in the same way that Cholera has. Nonetheless, the disease can be extremely dangerous as it has the potential to affect a number of people in a short period of time. Just like Cholera, the disease is transmitted through ingestion of food or water that has been contaminated by the feces of a human carrier of the infective organism and can spread at a very fast rate. If not properly managed, Dysentery caused by Shigella dysenteriae type 1 (Sd1) can have a case fatality of up to 10% or more [2].
The disease has been recurrent in some parts of the world and is highly associated with high mortality in children [3]. Children below the age of 5 years and malnourished people [4] are mostly affected and are at a high risk of dying due to dysentery [5]. In 2015, Diarrhea diseases accounted for over 1.3 million deaths globally [6]. Dysentery caused by Shigella species (S. flexneri, S. sonnei, S. boydii, and S. dysenteriae) remains a major source of diarrhea in most developing countries.
In Africa, one of the earliest documented Dysentery cases caused by Sd1 was recorded in Burundi in 1943 [7]. Since then, Dysentery has remained a major public health problem in Sub-Saharan countries. In the 1980s, Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) recorded devastating dysentery cases that saw the community incidence of 5 % to 6.4%.
Since 1991, dysentery epidemics have occurred in eight countries in southern Africa (Angola, Burundi, Malawi, Mozambique, Rwanda, Tanzania, Zaire, and Zambia) [8]. In 1992, Zimbabwe was hit by dysentery outbreaks which affected almost all the provinces. However, 149 dysentery patients died (CFR 3%) out of 4 915 patients that presented themselves to two municipal hospitals [9].
A number of factors such as overcrowding and poor water and hygiene infrastructure [10], limited access to improved water supplies and sanitation facilities [11] are some of the prominent factors that contribute to dysentery outbreaks. Globally, contaminated water causes millions and millions of cases of dysentery every year [12].
In Zambia, there is little documentation and studies that have been done on dysentery. However, a few papers that have been done show that inter house sharing of latrines [13] and contact with a person who has dysentery are some of the risk factors to the spread of the disease. This paper presents dysentery trend analysis results analyzed from the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) database.
Methodology
Reported dysentery suspected cases, confirmed and deaths were obtained from the IDSR weekly reports. Zambia is divided into 10 provinces; Lusaka, Western, Southern, Eastern, Copperbelt, Muchinga, Luapula, Northern, North-Western and Central province with a projected population of 16.8 million people [14].
In Zambia, Dysentery has been classified as a notifiable disease. All clinics and hospitals are required to report cases to the district surveillance officer. Data was entered and cleaned in Microsoft excel. Data on both clinical and laboratory confirmed cases were collected and analyzed in Microsoft excel. Additionally, this paper also retrospectively presents all dysentery related deaths as reported and confirmed in the IDSR reports. A spatial distribution of the three years in perspective was conducted using Tableau 2019.2. According to the IDSR, a suspected case is a person with diarrhea with visible blood in the stool while a confirmed case is a suspected case with stool culture positive for Shigella dysenteria type 1.
Results
In absolute terms, the highest number of cases have always been recorded in the fourth quarter of each year with 2016 recording 13450 suspected cases, 2017 (18866) and 2018 (15347). It’s generally observed that more confirmed cases (of the samples sent to the laboratory) are observed in Quarter 1 of each year; 2016 (88.2%), 2017 (72.6%) and 2018 (29.8%). According to the data collected, there was only one [1] dysentery related death for the period of three years (table 1)
Table 1 Descriptive Statistics of Reported Cases of Dysentery between 2016 and 2018 by quarter (Epi – 52 Weeks)
Note: Quarter 1 (Jan-Mar) | Quarter 2 (Apr-Jun) | Quarter 3 (Jul-Sep) | Quarter 4 (Oct-Dec) Figure 1 Trend of dysentery suspected cases by epidemiological week (2016-2018) In Zambia, the majority of dysentery suspected cases occurred during the summer (between 2016 and 208) which is mostly the rainy season corresponding to November to April (Fig 2). Suspected cases peak during epidemiological week 33 to week 44. A steady reduction of the suspected cases is noticed between week 45 and week 52. Generally, suspected cases tend to reduce between epidemiological week 8 through to week 32 with cases below 850 (2016-2018). Figure 1 Trend of dysentery suspected cases by epidemiological week (2016-2018) In absolute terms, three provinces (Central, Eastern and Southern) recorded above 20, 000 suspected dysentery cases between 2016 and 2018. Central province had the highest number of (28, 746) followed by Easter (25, 718) and Southern (22, 494) respectively. Muchinga province recorded the lowest (4, 962) (Figure 2). From the samples sent for laboratory confirmation, Southern province (381) recorded the highest number of positive cases while Central and Western province both had the lowest with 8 cases (figure 2).
7 In absolute terms, three provinces (Central, Eastern and Southern) recorded above 20, 000 suspected dysentery cases between 2016 and 2018. Central province had the highest number of (28, 746) followed by Easter (25, 718) and Southern (22, 494) respectively. Muchinga province recorded the lowest (4, 962) (Figure 2). From the samples sent for laboratory confirmation, Southern province (381) recorded the highest number of positive cases while Central and Western province both had the lowest with 8 cases (figure 2).
Discussion Incidence The incidence rate of dysentery suspected cases during 2016 to 2018 in Zambia showed an overall increase. The lowest rate (25.1 per 10,000 population) was observed in 2016. This incidence is relatively high compared to other countries that have made tremendous efforts towards improving the living conditions (sanitation, water supply system etc). For instance, in 2009, the incidence of dysentery varied considerably from place to place in China, with the highest incidence of 14.2 per 10,000 in Beijing, and lowest incidence being reported in Jiangsu and Guangdong Provinces(15).
Suspected cases vs. confirmed The Zambia National Public Health Institute throw its surveillance cluster has continuously been collecting data on cases from well-trained surveillance officers and clinicians. Additionally, laboratory technicians across the country have been adequately trained to identify Shigella species. Therefore, it is expected that data presented on the cases is a true representative picture of what is prevailing at provincial level.
In countries with scarce resources like Zambia, the role of the laboratory is to use those resources to provide the best information for developing treatment policy, rather than to focus on the diagnosis of individual patients. However, there is still a huge disparity in the suspected cases and samples sent for laboratory confirmation (16). Continued sensitization of healthcare workers about dysenetry case definitions and reporting procedures could also help increase the proportion of suspected dysentery cases for whom samples are collected and sent for laboratory confirmation. Different studies have acknowledged how difficult it is to clinically distinguish between non-bloody diarrheas caused by Shigella dysenteriae from diarrhea caused by other enteric pathogens. This could possibly explain the huge discrepancy between suspected cases and samples sent for laboratory confirmation.
Seasonality Between 2016 and 2018, the majority of dysentery cases were recorded during summer months. A retrospective study done in China for the years between 1991
to 2000 established that the majority of the dysentery cases were recorded during the months of summer(Wang, 2006). In Vietnam, incidences of dysentery are significantly high during the wet season particulary between May and October (17) (18) (19) (20). Different studies have shown that the hot season provides a suitable environment for the growth of bacteria (17) (15) (21). This study shows that the peak period for dysentery suspected cases is in October which is generally the peak of the hot season in Zambia.
Geographic location Central province has the highest recorded suspected cases in all the three years (2016-2018). According to the koppen-Geiger climate classification of 1980-2016, this area is characterized by dry winter and hot summer with temperature ranging from 21.4°C to 29.3°C (22). A study done in Kon Tam Province in Vietnam from 1999 to 2013 showed that there was a correlation between weather change and dysentery cases. Findings of the study showed that a 1 °C increase in temperature increased the incidence of dysentery cases by 6% (17).
Conclusion The incidence of dysentery suspected cases remains high in Zambia. With increasing antimicrobial-resistant on Shigella bacteria, there is need to scale up preventive interventions to Central province in order to see the much needed reduction of dysentery cases. Prevention of Shigella infections through vaccination or improvements in safe drinking water and sanitation would be the long-term solution. However, as a short term measure, continued health education on dysentery risk factors and provision of clean and safe water should be prioritized in areas with high cases.
LIST OF REFERENCES 1. https://www.who.int/topics/dysentery/en/ 2. http://www.who.int/emc 3. Barry EM, Pasetti MF, Sztein MB, Fasano A, Kotloff KL, Levine MM: Progress and pitfalls in Shigella vaccine research. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013, 10 (4): 245-255. 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.12. 4. https://rehydrate.org/dd/su55.htm 5 . Wilkins, L., 1927. The incidence of dysentery and diarrhea among white infants under two years of age. Am. J. Dis. Child. 33, 705–710. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1927.04130170003001 6. GBD 2015 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national life expectancy, all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 249 causes of death, 1980–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet. 2016; 388: 1459-1544 7. Jadin J, Resseler J. La dysenterie bacillaire au Ruanda-Urundi et au Kivu. Annales de la Societ6 belge de M6decine tropicale, 1957, 37: 347-369. 8. https://www.infoplease.com/math-science/health/diseases/water-borne-diseases-cholera-and-dysentery-epidemic-dysentery 9.Mwenye, S. et al., (1997) Risk factors associated with contracting dysentery during shigella dysenteriae type 1 outbreak in Harare, 1993, Central African Journal of Medicine, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 111-113. Harare: CAJM 10.WHO. Guidelines for the Control of Shigellosis, including Epidemics due to Shigella dysenteriae 1. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2005 11. https://www.infoplease.com/math-science/health/diseases/water-borne-diseases-cholera-and-dysentery-epidemic-dysentery 12. https://www.infoplease.com/math-science/health/diseases/water-borne-diseases-cholera-and-dysentery-epidemic-dysentery 13. Tuttle J, Ries AA, Chimba RM, Perera CU, Bean NH, Griffin PM. Antimicrobial-resistant epidemic Shigella dysenteriae type 1 in Zambia: modes of transmission. J Infect Dis 1995;171(2):371 14.Central statistical office (CSO) [Zambia], (2015). Population and Demographic Projections 2011 – 2035. Lusaka, Central statistics office 15. Li, Z., Wang, L., Sun, W., Hou, X., Yang, H., Sun, L., Xu, S., Sun, Q., Zhang, J., Song, H., Lin, H., 2013. Identifying high-risk areas of bacillary dysentery and associated meteorological factors in Wuhan, China. Sci. Rep. 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03239 16. https://www.cdc.gov/cholera/pdf/Laboratory-Methods-for-the-Diagnosis-of-Epidemic-Dysentery-and-Cholera.pdf 17. Lee, H.S., Ha Hoang, T.T., Pham-Duc, P., Lee, M., Grace, D., Phung, D.C., Thuc, V.M., Nguyen-Viet, H., 2017. Seasonal and geographical distribution of bacillary dysentery (shigellosis) and associated climate risk factors in Kon Tam Province in Vietnam from 1999 to 2013. Infect. Dis. Poverty 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-017-0325-z 18.Vu, D.T., Sethabutr, O., Von Seidlein, L., Tran, V.T., Do, G.C., Bui, T.C., Le, H.T., Lee, H., Houng, H.-S., Hale, T.L., Clemens, J.D., Mason, C., Dang, D.T., 2004. Detection of Shigella by a PCR assay targeting the ipaH gene suggests increased prevalence of shigellosis in Nha Trang, Vietnam. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42, 2031–2035. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.42.5.2031-2035.2004 19. Kelly-Hope, L.A., Alonso, W.J., Thiem, V.D., Canh, D.G., Anh, D.D., Lee, H., Miller, M.A., 2008. Temporal trends and climatic factors associated with bacterial enteric diseases in Vietnam, 1991-2001. Environ. Health Perspect. 116, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9658 20. Vu Nguyen, T., Le Van, P., Le Huy, C., Nguyen Gia, K., Weintraub, A., 2006. Etiology and epidemiology of diarrhea in children in Hanoi, Vietnam. Int. J. Infect. Dis. IJID Off. Publ. Int. Soc. Infect. Dis. 10, 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2005.05.009 21. Kelly-Hope, L.A., Alonso, W.J., Thiem, V.D., Anh, D.D., Canh, D.G., Lee, H., Smith, D.L., Miller, M.A., 2007. Geographical distribution and risk factors associated with enteric diseases in Vietnam. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 76, 706–712.
Since the first description of sickle cell disease (SCD) in 1910 in the United States of America (USA) in a young man of African descent [1], a lot of effort was dedicated to understanding the disorder such that within 40 years of its first description, it’s epidemiology and pathophysiology had been well described [2,3]. Despite this knowledge, it did not immediately translate into improved identification of and care for persons with SCD. This led to Ranney to remark in her 1972 editorial; “The fact that the biochemical abnormality and its pathological consequences are so much better delineated in sickling than in most other serious diseases has led to the notion that the most notable deficit in our care of sicklers is in the delayed application of our knowledge to the treatment of patients with sickle cell disease and to the detection of individuals with sickle cell trait.” [4].
As of 2019, Zambia is still grappling with the issues of diagnosis of the condition. We still have individuals being diagnosed with sickle cell anaemia well into their adulthood and we still do not know the prevalence of the sickle cell gene in our population. Twenty years ago, it was understandable to have a delayed diagnosis of sickle cell disease because the diagnosis required laboratory facilities. One needed at least a microscope or a centrifuge and a proficient laboratory person to diagnose the disease. Today the development of easy to use point of care test kits for sickle cell diagnosis makes it inexcusable for one to be diagnosed with the condition in adulthood let alone in late childhood. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 5% of the global population carries the trait genes for sickle cell disease or thalassaemia, the major haemoglobin disorders and can be as high as 25% in some regions. It is further estimated that over 300,000 babies are born each year with a severe disorder of haemoglobin of which 200,000 are sickle cell disease [5]. Sickle cell disease is the major haemoglobin disorder in Africa while thalassaemia predominates in the Mediterranean and Asia. Many children with severe forms of sickle cell disease die before the age of 5 years either from severe anaemia, malaria and invasive bacterial infection [6].
Having realised that SCD is a major health burden on the African region, the World Health Organization adopted a strategy that aims to reduce the incidence, morbidity and mortality due to SCD [7]. Core to this strategy is i) Understanding the prevalence of the sickle cell gene in the population, ii) Early identification of persons with SCD and iii) Early interventions for persons with SCD to reduce morbidity and mortality.
We have easy to use point of care tests such as the SickleSCAN® test kit which has been evaluated for use in Zambia. This point of care device can be used by any healthcare provider to identify persons with the sickle cell gene or SCD [8]. With this kit we can then screen all antenatal mothers for the SCD, we can use this kit to screen all children presenting with anaemia at any health facility. In so doing we would be i) Generating information about the prevalence of the sickle cell gene in the Zambian population. We have health informatics systems that can be used to manage this data and feed into the overall Zambian strategy on SCD. ii) Identifying newborns that would require further testing for SCD, iii) Identifying children with SCD and intervening early.
We have a functioning system for the transportation of dried blood spot (DBS) specimens for early infant diagnosis of HIV infection. We can leverage this system to transport samples for infants and children requiring laboratory confirmation of the sickle cell status. It has been shown that DBS specimens can be used for haemoglobin (Hb) electrophoresis [9]
We have several health facilities that have the equipment for Hb electrophoreses such as UTH Adult, Ndola Teaching Hospital and Arthur Davison Children’s Hospital. These could be used as initial hubs for the SCD programme. Skilled laboratory personnel capable of doing Hb electrophoresis and quantification are there.
We have knowledgeable healthcare providers capable of providing comprehensive healthcare to persons living with SCD. This is evidenced by the establishment of specialized sickle cell clinics in facilities like ADH and Livingstone Teaching Hospital.
In her speech to the Minister of Health on World Sickle Cell Day, Lwimba Kasongo, a person living with SCD, made a passionate appeal for the institution of comprehensive healthcare services for persons living with SCD at all health care levels.
In his response, the Minister of Health represented by the Permanent Secretary – Technical Services, Dr Kennedy Malama, assured the SCD community that the condition was being given priority. He tasked technical experts led by Dr Catherine Chunda to come up with a Zambian Strategy for SCD.
Whilst we may not have all the resources to implement a fully functional “ well oiled” SCD programme, we do however have enough resources to implement activities that will have a positive impact on our knowledge of the condition in our population, on the reduction of childhood mortality from SCD and the quality of life persons living with SCD.
Welcome to the July 2019 THP-Z issue. In this issue, we share an article entitled ‘Trend and disease burden of dysentery in Zambia 2016-2018’. The article is informed by data emanating from the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) program. The publication intimates a continued high incidence of suspected dysentery cases in Zambia. Our guest editor focused on Sickle Cell Disease (SCD), a condition identified over a century ago and yet still remains a major health burden especially on the African region. Noting that the major challenge in managing SCD lies in the inadequate capacity to diagnose the condition early enough and late intervening leading to increased morbidity and mortality, the guest editor encourages a strategy to implement a fully functional program. I encourage you to read through and get an interesting understanding of SCD and what should be done to improve the outcomes. We also publish the Influenza July monthly bulletin. Allow me to bring to the attention of Hepatitis disease. The WHO estimates about 325 million people worldwide are living with hepatitis B or C and yet approximately 80% have no access to testing and treatment, leading to 1.4 million deaths a year. The world celebrates and brings to the attention of all parties. It is for this reason THP-Z joined the rest of the world in creating awareness of hepatitis as a disease and the possible prevention and treatment strategies. Look out for a paper on hepatitis in the next issue. Meanwhile, feel free to look up the previous article on hepatitis in our archived issues: Nshimbi N, Ngoma A. Hepatitis B: Vaccinate. Stop It In Its Tracks!!! Addressing The Hepatitis B Prevalence In The Adult Population In Zambia. Health Press Zambia Bull. 2019; 3(3); pp 10-13.; Mulambya Nl, Moraes A, Mititiri M, Washington M. What The Hep Is Going On?: Protecting Future Generations By Addressing Hepatitis B Among Pregnant Women And Newborns In Zambia. Health Press Zambia Bull. 2019;3(1); Pp 3-6.; and Mazaba ML.Hepatitis. Health Press Zambia Bull. 2018;2(5); pp 1-2. We acknowledge Hepatitis as a public health problem and support the initiatives including continued surveillance, laboratory confirmation for effective treatment and prevention. Once again we invite you to submit your articles to THP-Z using the link https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/thpz.